RTO care

직류회로

동력과 에너지2016. 6. 27. 09:35

Ⅰ. 직류회로   

( 1 ) 전기의 발생

       [1] 원자의 구조 : 물질은 분자 또는 원자의 집합으로 이루어져 있음

             

원자 : 양전하를 가진 원자핵과 음전하를 가진 전자로 구성.

                

            에니메이션 참고 사이트   http://user.chollian.net/~kimjh94/junja/junja_1/junja1-1.html

                                                         http://home.cmh.hs.kr/~choys/webEL/Esyj333/1-1-1.htm

     [2] 원자핵

원자핵 : 양성자와 중성자로 구성.

양성자와 중성자의 질량은 거의 같으며, 전자의 약 1840배인 입자.

양성자와 중성자를 한데 합하여 핵자라 함.

동위원소 : 같은 원소이지만 원자 1개씩 비교하면 양서자 수는 같지만, 핵자의 총수로 나타내는 질량수가 다른 원소

     [3] 자유전자

단결정 : 다수의 원자가 규칙적인 그물 눈금(격자)모양으로 배열된 결정.

     ex) 실리콘(Si), 게르마늄(Ge)

       

   

다결정 : 단결정의 조각들이 많이 모여있는 구조.

     ex) 구리(Cu)

자유전자 : 전자 중에서 원자핵의 인력에 의한 구속을 떠나 자유롭게 이동할 수 있는 것.

 구리의 원자 모형

여기와 방사 및원자로부터 전자기파 방사

           에니메이션 참고 사이트   http://user.chollian.net/~kimjh94/junja/junja_1/junja1-1.html

                                                     http://home.cmh.hs.kr/~choys/webEL/Esyj333/1-1-1.htm

전자각은 원자핵 가까이부터 순서대로 1, 2, 3, …, n번째, 이것을 K각(2개), L각(8개), M각(18개), N각(32개), …, Q각이라 한다.

자유전자의 전하량 e=-1.602189×10-19[C]

자유전자의 질량 m0=9.109534×10-31[kg]

   

출처: <http://jojo.namoweb.net/elec-4/el-1-1.htm>

'동력과 에너지' 카테고리의 다른 글

저항의 접속  (0) 2016.06.27
기본 전기회로  (0) 2016.06.27
전력과 전력량  (0) 2016.06.27
전기의 역사  (0) 2016.06.27
저NOx 버너  (0) 2016.06.26

(5) 전력과 전력량   

 참고사이트 http://user.chollian.net/~kimjh94/jungi/jungi_2/jungi2-3.html

(2) 전력량과 전력  

[1] 전력

전력 : 1초 동안에 전기가 하는 일의 양(전기에너지가 빛이나 열에너지로 변화되는 일)

     

   기호는 P, 단위는 [W]

[2]전력량

전력량 : 일정한 시간 동안 전기가 하는 일의 양.

  (어느 시간동안 전기에너지가 빛이나 열에너지로 소비된 일의 양)

    

기호는 W, 단위는 [J]

1 킬로와트시 [ kWh ] : 1 [kW]의 전력을 1시간 사용했을 때 일의 양

   1 [ kWh ] = 1000 [Wh] = 60(분) × 60 (초) × 1000  = 3600 × 103 [WS]

   W = P·t = 3.6 × 103 [J]

[3] 전력과 전력량의 단위

   

전  력

mW

W

kW

1[mW]=1/1000 [W]

1[kW]=1000 [W]

전력량

W·s

Wh

kWh

1[W]의 전력에서 1[s] 동안, 1[J]

1[W]의 전력에서 1[h] 동안, 3600[W·s]

1[kW]의 전력에서 1[h] 동안, 3600×1000[W·s]

   

[1] 전류의 발열 작용  

 1) 줄의 법칙

전류의 발열 작용 : 전열기에 전류를 흘리면 열이 발생하는 현상.

줄의 법칙 : 어떤 도체에 일정 기간 동안 전류를 흘리면 도체에는 열이 발생되는데

   이에 관한 법칙. 단위는 [J]

(1[cal]=4.186[J])

( 1cal는 물 1g을 온도 1 [℃] 높이는데 필요한 열량 )

 2) 줄열의 이용

공업용-전기용접기, 전기로, 가정용-전기난로, 전기밥솥, 전기다리미, 백열전구

 3)온도상승과 허용전류

허용 전류 : 전선에 안전하게 흘릴 수 있는 최대 전류 (주위온도 30℃이하로 결정)

전선을 허용전류에 맞게 사용하지 않으면 전기적인 사고의 원인이 된다.

   

출처: <http://jojo.namoweb.net/elec-4/el-1-5.htm>

'동력과 에너지' 카테고리의 다른 글

기본 전기회로  (0) 2016.06.27
직류회로  (0) 2016.06.27
전기의 역사  (0) 2016.06.27
저NOx 버너  (0) 2016.06.26
LNG  (0) 2016.06.24

전기의 역사

세계전기의 역사

BC600 탈레스(그리스) : 전기의 발견 (마찰(정)전기)

탈레스 (철학자) [ Thales, BC 624 ~ BC 546 ]

BC 600년경 그리스의 탈레스는 호박이라는 보석을 마찰하면 가벼운 물체를 흡인하는 것을 발견했어요. 이것이 전기 현상의 최초의 발견인데, 이 호박을 의미하는 그리스어의 '일렉트론(electron)'이라는 말에 유래하여 '일렉트리시티(electricity)'라는 말이 생성된 것으로 전해집니다.

1600 길버트 (영국) : 지구가 거대한 자석임을 확인

길버트(의사, 물리학자) [ Gilbert William 1544~ 1603 ]

자기학(磁氣學)의 아버지라고 불리죠. 자기력과 마찰전기에 대해 처음으로 연구했으며 18년간의 연구결과를 <자석에 대하여>라는 책으로 펴냈어요. 이 책은 자기 및 지구자기의 현상을 조직적이고 순수 경험적으로 다루어, 지구 자체가 하나의 자석임을 발견하였고 자침이 남북으로 향하는 이유를 밝혔답니다.

1729 그레이 (영국) : '도체'와 '절연체'를 발견

그레이 (물리학자) [ Gray Stephen 1670 ~ 1736 ]

전자기학 연구의 선구자입니다. G.휠러와 공동으로 실험하여 전기적 성질을 먼 곳까지 인도하는 물체인 도체와 그렇지 않은 물체인 절연체와의 구별을 분명히 하여 그것이 물체의 빛깔 등에 의한 것이 아니라 물체를 구성하는 물질의 속성이라는 사실과 인체도 도체인 사실을 밝혀내 전자기학 발전에 기여하였지요.

1746 뮈센브루크(네덜란드) : 전기를 모으는 '라이덴병'을 발명.

뮈센브루크 (실험물리학자) [Musschenbroek Pietervan 1692~1761]

라이덴병은 1746년에 네덜란드 라이덴 대학의 뮈센브루크가 방전 실험에 사용한데서 이 이름을 붙이게 되었어요. 병마개의 중심을 통해 내부로 드리운 금속 막대 끝에 사슬을 매달아 밑면과 닿게 하였으며, 금속 막대에 전하를 주면 정전 유도에 의해서 전위차가 생겨 전기를 모으게 되는 거죠.

1752 프랭클린(미국) : 연날리기 실험으로 번개가 전기인 것을 증명

프랭클린 (과학자) [ Franklin, Benjamin 1706~1790 ]

뮈센브루크의 라이덴병 전기실험 소식을 전해들은 프랭클린은 라이덴병을 이용, 1752년 그의 유명한 실험인 '연 실험'을 행하였고, 번개가 전기를 방전한다는 것을 증명하였어요. 그는 번개를 구름에서 끌어내기 위해 금속으로 만든 뾰족탑을 세우자고 제안하였으며 이러한 연구들의 결과 최초의 피뢰침이 발명되었죠.

1780 갈바니(이탈리아) : '동물전기'를 발표

갈바니 (물리학자) [ Galvani, Luigi 1737~1798 ]

볼로냐대학의 해부학 교수였던 갈바니는 실험실에서 개구리의 다리를 절개하다가, 개구리 다리의 근육신경 조직을 두 가지 다른 금속 조각들에 접촉시켜 놓으면 개구리의 다리에 경련이 일어난다는 사실을 발견하였어요. 이 발견은 당시에 전기현상에 관심이 있던 많은 사람들에게 전류현상에 대한 착상을 하게 하여 전기에 관한 연구의 방향을 크게 돌리는데 중요한 계기가 되었죠.

1785 쿨롱(프랑스) : '쿨롱의 법칙'을 발표

쿨롱 (물리학자, 전기학자) [ Charles Augustin de Coulomb 1736 - 1806 ]

1785년 전기력과 자기력 측정을 연구하던 쿨롱은 '전하 사이에 작용하는 인력과 척력은 두 전하량의 곱에 비례하고, 거리의 제곱에 반비례 한다'는 사실을 발견 하였으며1787년 쿨롱의 법칙이 전기와 자기 모두에 적용된다는 사실을 확인했죠. 이것은 전기로 발생하는 모든 현상을 설명하는 기본이 되었답니다.

1800 볼타(이탈리아) : '볼타전지'를 발명

볼타 (이탈리아의 물리학자) [ Volta 1745~1827]

볼타는 2개의 다른 금속을 소금 용액 내에서 접촉시킬 때 전류가 흐른다는 것을 발견하고 최초의 화학 전지를 발명했어요. 그가 만든 볼타 전지는 오늘날 전자 제품에 들어가는 모든 전기의 원조가 되었죠. 전기 제품에 쓰인 V(볼트)라는 기호가 바로 그의 이름을 따서 만들어진 것이 랍니다.

1826 옴(독일) : '옴의 법칙'을 발표

옴 (독일의 물리학자) [ Ohm, Georg Simon, 1789~1854 ]

옴은 1826년 베를린에서 전류와 저항, 전압 사이의 관계를 연구했어요.

그래서 '전류의 세기는 도선의 두 끝에 가해진 전압에 비례하고 저항에 반비례 한다'라는 옴 의 법칙을 발견했죠. 오늘날 전기 기구들을 구성하고 있는 모든 전기회로는 이러한 옴의 법칙을 따르고 있죠. 전기 저항을 나타내는 옴(Ω)은 그의 이름을 따서 붙인 것이랍니다.

1831 패러데이(영국) : '전자기 유도법칙'을 발표

패러데이 (영국의 물리학자) [ Faraday, Michael, 1791 ~ 1867 ]

1831년은 패러데이의 가장 중요한 업적으로 꼽히는 전자기 유도 현상이 발견이 발견된 해입니다. 전류가 자기장을 생성하여 나침반을 움직이게 한다는 사실은 1820년 덴마크의 물리학자 외르스테드에 의하여 이미 밝혀져 있었죠. 패러데이는 여기서 한걸음 더 나아가 자석을 움직여주면 전류가 흐른다는 사실을 알아내어 최초의 발전기를 발명하였답니다.

1840 줄(영국) : '줄의 법칙'을 발표

줄 (영국의 물리학자) [Joule, James Prescott 1818~1889 ]

도체에 전류가 흐를 때 발생하는 열인 줄열에 대해 발견한 법칙이에요. 1840년 J.P.줄은 전류가 열을 발생시킨다는 점에 주목하여 저항을 통과하는 전류가 발생시키는 열은 흘려준 전류의 제곱에 비례한다는 법칙을 발견하였어요. 그 후 그는 1847년 학회에서 연구결과에 대한 강연 중에 W.톰슨과 알게 되어 오랫동안 공동연구를 하며 '줄톰슨효과'등 많은 업적을 남겼어요.

1864 맥스웰(영국) : '빛의 전자기파설'을 발표

맥스웰 [ Maxwell, James Clerk, 1831~1879 ]

그가 발견한 '맥스웰 방정식'의 가장 큰 의의는 전기와 자기를 측정 가능한 단일한 힘으로 통합했다는 데 있어요. 쉽게 말하자면 빛도 전자기파의 일부이며 눈에 보인다는 것이 큰 특징일 뿐이라는 것이죠. 그의 연구는 라디오와 텔레비전을 비롯한 모든 전자통신기술의 기본이 되었답니다.

1879 에디슨 : 백열전구 발명

에디슨 (미국의 발명가) [ Thomas Alva Edison 1847~ 1931 ]

1800년 당시의 전구는 몇 초도 못가 필라멘트가 타버렸습니다.

1879년 10월 전구의 수명을 늘이기 위해 연구를 거듭하던 에디슨은 필라멘트 재료로 사용하던 백금을 버리고 탄소로 바꾸어 실험한 결과 에디슨은 2일 42분 동안 전구를 밝히는 데 성공했어요. 그 전구가 다 타서 꺼진 그날, 1879년 10월 21일은 일반적으로 최초의 실용적인 전등이 탄생한 날로 기억되지요.

1881 최초의 상업발전소: 뉴욕중앙발전소

1879년 백열전구를 발명한 에디슨은 일반인이 널리 전등을 사용하기 위해 뉴욕에 발전소를

세웠어요. 당시의 발전소는 직류식이기 때문에 먼 곳에 전기를 보내면 전압이 내려가는 단점이 있어 도심지 한 가운데 세워졌으면 '중앙발전소'로 불려졌답니다.

1888 헤르츠(독일) : 전자파 증명

헤르츠(물리학자) [Hertz, Heinrich Rudolf, 1857.2.22~1894.1.1]

맥스웰의 전자기 이론을 토대로 전자기파를 만들어 내, 빛과 열이 전자기 복사임을 명확하게 입증해 냈어요. 즉 최초로 전파를 송. 수신하여 전자기파가 실제로 존재할 뿐만 아니라, 먼 거리에서도 탐지할 수 있음을 증명하였죠. 전자기파의 주파수를 측정하는 단위는 그의 이름을 따서 헤르츠(Hz)로 지어졌답니다.

1895 뢴트겐(독일) : X선을 발견 (1910년 노벨 물리학상 수상)

뢴트겐 (독일의 물리학자) [ 1845.3.27~1923.2.10 ]

1895년 뢴트겐은 방전관을 이용하여 음극선을 금속에 부딪치면 새로운 선이 방출된다는 사실을 발견하였어요. 그 선이 대단한 투과력과 투명한 물체도 통과한다는 점을 알아냈어요. 뢴트겐은 아내의 손을 그 선으로 찍어 성공을 거두었죠. 그러나 이 선이 발생하는 원인은 알 수 없어서 그는 X선이란 용어를 붙였답니다.

1897 톰슨 (영국) : '전자'의 존재를 증명 (1906년 노벨 물리학상 수상)

톰슨(영국 물리학자) [ Joseph John Thomson, 1856~1940 ]

톰슨은 1897년 영국 왕립연구소(Royal Institution)회의에서 자신이 음전하를 띤 원자 이하의 미립(corpuscle)의 하전량과 질량의 비를 알아냈다고 했는데, 톰슨이 발견한 이 미립자를 훗날 사람들은 전자(electron)라고 부르게 되었어요. 20세기에 들어와서 전자는 물리과학 분야는 물론 전자공학, 의공학등 다양한 응용 분야에서 핵심적인 역할을 하게 되었답니다.

1942 페르미-세계 최초의 원자로 완성

페르미 (이탈리아 물리학자) [ Fermi, Enrico, 1901.9.29~1954.11.28 ]

1942년 미국 시카고 대학에서 페르미가 설계한 CP-1(원자로)가 세계 최초로 우라늄 핵분열 연쇄반응 실험을 성공하였습니다. 1953년에 미국의 아이젠하워 대통령이 유엔에서 "원자력의 평화적 이용"을 제창하면서 미국의 원자력기술이 세계에 공개 되었고 이로 인해 많은 국가에서 원자력에 관한 연구개발이 시작되었습니다.

1956 최초의 원자력 발전소 가동

1956년 영국의 콜더 홀 원자력발전소가 세계 최초로 상업적 운전을 시작하면서, 뒤이어 1957년에 미국의 쉬핑포트 원자력발전소가 가동되는 등 원자력 산업이 활발해지기 시작했습니다.

한국의 전기역사

1887년 최초의 전기점등 : 에디슨이 백열전구를 발명한지 8년만에 경복궁의 건청궁에 우리나라 최초의 전등불을 밝힘

1898년 한성전기회사 설립 : 고종은 우리나라 최초의 전기회사 설립

1899년 최초의 전차개통 : 동대문과 서대문을 오가는 최초의 전차 운행

1900년 최초의 민간전기 점등 : 종로에 3개의 가로등 설치

1944년 수풍수력 발전소 준공 : 동양최대의 수풍수력발전소 완공되었으며 이밖에도 수력자원이 풍부한 압록강, 두만강, 장진강 등에 수력발전소를 건설하였다.

1948년 5.14단전 : 남한은 전력사용량의 70%를 북한에서 공급받았으나 북한의 일방적 단전으로 3분제나 격일제로 전기를 공급하는 심각한 전력난을 겪음

1961년 3사통합 한전창립 : 조선전업, 경성전기(구 한성전기), 남선전기 등 3사를 통합하여 한국전력 주식회사를 창립

1964년 무제한 송전 시행 : 전원개발 5개년계획(1962~1966)을 수립, 추진한 결과 4월 1일 무제한 송전이 이루어짐

1965년 농어촌 전화사업 : 농어촌과 산골, 섬에 사는 주민에게까지 전력 공급

1978년 원자력 시대개막 : 고리원자력 발전소가 준공되면서 원자력 발전 시대가 개막됨 (현재 원자력발전소 20기)

1995년 해외전력사업 본격진출 : 95년 필리핀 말라야 화력발전소 운영, 96년 일리한 발전소 건설 등 해외사업 진출 (세계 10여 개국 진출)

2001년 발전부문 분할 : 「전력산업 구조개편촉진에 관한 법률」에 의거 발전부문을 분할하여 6개의 발전회사 설립

2005년 영흥 해상 철탑 건설 : 영흥화력발전소의 발전전력을 수도권으로 수송하기 위해 세계최초로 시화호를 가로지르는 초대형 해상철탑을 완공

2005년 발전설비 6,000만㎾ 달성 : 울진원전 6호기 준공으로 발전설비 6,000만㎾ 돌파

- '82년 1,000만㎾, '89년 2,000만㎾, '95년 3,000만㎾, '97년 4,000만㎾, '01년 5,000만㎾

2005년 220V 승압완료 : 32년간에 걸쳐 가정전압을 110V에서 220V로 승압

   

원본 위치 <http://cafe.naver.com/ArticleRead.nhn?articleid=167359&clubid=11035222>

   

'동력과 에너지' 카테고리의 다른 글

직류회로  (0) 2016.06.27
전력과 전력량  (0) 2016.06.27
저NOx 버너  (0) 2016.06.26
LNG  (0) 2016.06.24
열기관의 종류  (0) 2016.06.24

What Is the Greenhouse Effect?

By Marc Lallanila | April 12, 2016 03:05pm ET

While other planets in Earth's solar system are either scorching hot or bitterly cold, Earth's surface has relatively mild, stable temperatures. Earth enjoys these temperatures because of its atmosphere, which is the thin layer of gases that cloak and protect the planet. 

However, 97 percent of climate scientists agree that humans have changed Earth's atmosphere in dramatic ways over the past two centuries, resulting in global warming. To understand global warming, it's first necessary to become familiar with the greenhouse effect, though.

Energy in, energy out

There's a delicate balancing act occurring every day all across the Earth, involving the radiation the planet receives from space and the radiation that's reflected back out to space.

Report this Advertisement

Earth is constantly bombarded with enormous amounts of radiation, primarily from the sun. This solar radiation strikes the Earth's atmosphere in the form of visible light, plus ultraviolet (UV), infrared (IR) and other types of radiation that are invisible to the human eye.

UV radiation has a shorter wavelength and a higher energy level than visible light, while IR radiation has a longer wavelength and a weaker energy level. About 30 percent of the radiation striking Earth's atmosphere is immediately reflected back out to space by clouds, ice, snow, sand and other reflective surfaces, according to NASA. The remaining 70 percent of incoming solar radiation is absorbed by the oceans, the land and the atmosphere. As they heat up, the oceans, land and atmosphere release heat in the form of IR thermal radiation, which passes out of the atmosphere and into space.

It's this equilibrium of incoming and outgoing radiation that makes the Earth habitable, with an average temperature of about 59 degrees Fahrenheit (15 degrees Celsius), according to NASA. Without this atmospheric equilibrium, Earth would be as cold and lifeless as its moon, or as blazing hot as Venus. The moon, which has almost no atmosphere, is about minus 243 F (minus 153 C) on its dark side. Venus, on the other hand, has a very dense atmosphere that traps solar radiation; the average temperature on Venus is about 864 F (462 C).

The greenhouse effect

The exchange of incoming and outgoing radiation that warms the Earth is often referred to as the greenhouse effect because a greenhouse works in much the same way.

Incoming UV radiation easily passes through the glass walls of a greenhouse and is absorbed by the plants and hard surfaces inside. Weaker IR radiation, however, has difficulty passing through the glass walls and is trapped inside, thus warming the greenhouse. This effect lets tropical plants thrive inside a greenhouse, even during a cold winter.

A similar phenomenon takes place in a car parked outside on a cold, sunny day. Incoming solar radiation warms the car's interior, but outgoing thermal radiation is trapped inside the car's closed windows.

Greenhouse gases and global warming

"Gas molecules that absorb thermal infrared radiation, and are in significant enough quantity, can force the climate system. These type of gas molecules are called greenhouse gases," Michael Daley, an associate professor of Environmental Science at Lasell College told Live Science. Carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases act like a blanket, absorbing IR radiation and preventing it from escaping into outer space. The net effect is the gradual heating of Earth's atmosphere and surface, a process known as global warming

These greenhouse gases include water vapor, CO2, methane, nitrous oxide (N2O) and other gases, according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution in the early 1800s, the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil and gasoline have greatly increased the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, especially CO2, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). "Deforestation is the second largest anthropogenic source of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere ranging between 6 percent and 17 percent," said Daley. 

Atmospheric CO2 levels have increased by more than 40 percent since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, from about 280 parts per million (ppm) in the 1800s to 400 ppm today. The last time Earth's atmospheric levels of CO2 reached 400 ppm was during the Pliocene Epoch, between 5 million and 3 million years ago, according to the University of California, San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography.

The greenhouse effect, combined with increasing levels of greenhouse gases and the resulting global warming, is expected to have profound implications, according to the near-universal consensus of scientists.

If global warming continues unchecked, it will cause significant climate change, a rise in sea levels, increasing ocean acidification, extreme weather events and other severe natural and societal impacts, according to NASA, the EPA and other scientific and governmental bodies.

Can the greenhouse effect be reversed?

Many scientists agree that the damage to the Earth's atmosphere and climate is past the point of no return or that the damage is near the point of no return. "I agree that we have passed the point of avoiding climate change," Josef Werne, an associate professor at the department of geology & planetary science at the University of Pittsburgh told Live Science. In Werne's opinion, there are three options from this point forward: 

  1. Do nothing and live with the consequences.
  2. Adapt to the changing climate (which includes things like rising sea level and related flooding).
  3. Mitigate the impact of climate change by aggressively enacting policies that actually reduce the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere.

Keith Peterman, a professor of chemistry at York College of Pennsylvania, and Gregory Foy, an associate professor of chemistry at York College of Pennsylvania believes that the damage isn't to that point yet, and that international agreements and action can save the planet's atmosphere. 

Additional reporting by Alina Bradford, Live Science Contributor

For the latest information on the greenhouse effect, visit:

Additional resources

Editor's Recommendations

   

출처: <http://www.livescience.com/37743-greenhouse-effect.html>

'지구별 이야기 > 기후와 지구온난화' 카테고리의 다른 글

Jet stream  (0) 2016.10.26
Global Warming  (0) 2016.06.28
Greenhouse gas emission: Cause and Sources  (0) 2016.06.27
지구온난화  (1) 2016.06.27
Global warming  (1) 2016.06.27

CO2 gets stoned:

관련기술2016. 6. 27. 09:09

CO2 Gets Stoned: Method Turns Harmful Gas Into Solid

By Jesse Emspak, Live Science Contributor | June 10, 2016 08:42am ET

   

Researchers have captured carbon dioxide from Iceland's Hellisheidi geothermal power plant and turned it into a solid.

Credit: Kevin Krajick/Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory

Engineers have taken a tip from Medusa, it seems. They have stared down the pesky greenhouse gas carbon dioxide and turned it to stone.

The process they used was not as easy as simply eyeballing the gas, though. Essentially, they relied on a sped-up version of natural processes to take the carbon dioxide (CO2) spewed from a power plant in Iceland and transform the gas into a solid.

This ability to capture carbon dioxide and store it indefinitely may help curb the levels of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere and stem global warming, the researchers noted. [Changing Earth: 7 Ideas to Geoengineer Our Planet]

Report this Advertisement

"We need to deal with rising carbon emissions," lead study author Juerg Matter, now an associate professor of geoengineering at the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom, said in a statement. "This is the ultimate permanent storage — turn them back to stone."

Natural carbon storage

Human-caused global warming occurs mostly because of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane, that get poured into the air by humans burning fossil fuels for energy and other processes. These gases trap heat before it can escape out into space. Carbon dioxide is the biggest factor in this warming, scientists have said, because billions of tons of the gas are released every year and it stays in the atmosphere for long periods of time.

Ordinarily, this gas is drawn out of the atmosphere by plants, which use it for photosynthesis, and a chemical process called weathering of rocks. This process happens when carbon dioxide and other gases that dissolve in water form weak acids that then chemically react with minerals in rocks to form other solids, like clays. However, both of those uptake processes are relatively slow, and they can't keep up with human output, the study researchers noted. [The Reality of Climate Change: 10 Myths Busted]

As such, engineers and other scientists have been working on several efforts to somehow inject the carbon dioxide into the ground. For instance, carbon dioxide is pumped into the tiny holes, or pores, in sedimentary rock — the kind laid down by layers of sand, for example, on the ocean floor.

The problem is that the carbon dioxide is a gas, and tends to rise. To keep it underground requires a placing a layer of less porous rock on top of the porous rock where the gas is stored. The carbon dioxide will eventually react with the porous rock and turn into a solid, carbonate compound, but that process can take centuries, if not millennia, according to study co-authorSigurdur Gislason, research professor at the University of Iceland in Reykjavik.

A new way to hide CO2

The team, led by Juerg Matter, now an associate professor of geoengineering at the University of Southampton, tried something different. The researchers took the carbon dioxide emitted by a power plant in Iceland, pressurized it to 25 atmospheres. They then pumped the CO2 into a borehole that was filled with water, dissolving the gas and making something like seltzer water. The mixture was then pumped into a layer of porous, volcanic rock located some 1,640 feet (500 meters) below the surface of the ground. The rock reacted with the mixture and formed carbonate compounds.  

Study co-author Sandra Snaebjornsdottir holds a sample of volcanic rock that is loaded with solidified carbonate, formed when the researchers pumped carbon dioxide into the rock.

Credit: Kevin Krajick/Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory

Essentially, the researchers sped up the weathering of rocks, Gislason told Live Science. Here's how it works: The carbon dioxide in the water forms carbonic acid, which dissolves the basalts and makes them more porous. Meanwhile, the carbon and oxygen from the CO2 make new compounds, largely magnesium, iron and calcium carbonates, which are solids that can't go anywhere. "Calcium, iron, magnesium can all form carbonates," Gislason said.

The process is very like what happens naturally, except that when stone either as mountains or stone buildings weathers, it happens as it rains, and rainwater only converts a small amount of carbon at a time. In addition, because the CO2 added to the water is under a lot more pressure than it is in the atmosphere, the concentration of carbonic acid is many times higher than in rainwater, or even in the carbonated water that people drink.

The study was conducted over a two-year period, noted study co-author Martin Stute, a research scientist at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in New York. In that time, the team monitored the water as it percolated through the rock using monitoring stations placed some distance from the injection site. They detected no CO2.

Even though the process requires a lot of water initially, that water can be recycled, because the other elements in it the carbon dioxide and the compounds in the rock are all removed in the reactions that form the carbonates, said Stute. He added that another advantage is that the water needn't be fresh; seawater should work just as well, though that hasn't been tried yet.

The next steps will be conducting more experiments and scaling up, the researchers said.

Both Gislason and Stute noted that the carbon dioxide would need to be transported to pumping sites if projects like this were built commercially, so the technique probably lends itself best to power plants that are close to areas with porous basaltic rock. Gislason said that describes many areas with power plants. "There are opportunities for this in Indonesia, or Japan," he said.

Still, the method offers a possible way to get rid of carbon dioxide quickly and cleanly, he said. "In a sense, you just mimic nature," Gislason said. "Just speeding up the process."

The study is detailed in the June 10 issue of the journal Science

Original article on Live Science.

Editor's Recommendations

   

출처: <http://www.livescience.com/55038-method-turns-carbon-dioxide-into-solid.html>

'관련기술' 카테고리의 다른 글

Removal of VOC using nonthermal Plasma  (0) 2016.06.27
Ozone 처리 설비  (0) 2016.06.27
미세먼지의 측정  (0) 2016.06.27
흡착시설  (0) 2016.06.27
세정시설  (0) 2016.06.27

Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Causes & Sources

By Marc Lallanilla | February 10, 2015 07:36pm ET

Behind the struggle to address global warming and climate change lies the increase in greenhouse gases in our atmosphere. A greenhouse gas is any gaseous compound in the atmosphere that is capable of absorbing infrared radiation, thereby trapping and holding heat in the atmosphere. By increasing the heat in the atmosphere, greenhouse gases are responsible for the greenhouse effect, which ultimately leads to global warming.

Solar radiation and the greenhouse effect

Global warming isn't a new study in science. The basics of the phenomenon were worked out by Svante Arrhenius in 1896. His paper, published in the Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, was the first to quantify the contribution of carbon dioxide to the greenhouse effect. 

The sun bombards Earth with enormous amounts of radiation, which strike Earth's atmosphere in the form of visible light, plus ultraviolet (UV), infrared (IR) and other types of radiation that are invisible to the human eye.

Report this Advertisement

About 30 percent of the radiation striking the Earth is reflected back out to space by clouds, ice and other reflective surfaces. The remaining 70 percent is absorbed by the oceans, the land and the atmosphere, according to NASA.

As they absorb radiation and heat up, the oceans, land and atmosphere release heat in the form of IR thermal radiation, which passes out of the atmosphere into space. The balance between incoming and outgoing radiation keeps Earth's overall average temperature at about 59 degrees Fahrenheit (15 degrees Celsius), according to NASA.

This exchange of incoming and outgoing radiation that warms Earth is often referred to as the "greenhouse effect" because a greenhouse works in much the same way. Incoming UV radiation easily passes through the glass walls of a greenhouse and is absorbed by the plants and hard surfaces inside. Weaker IR radiation, however, has difficulty passing out through the glass walls and is trapped inside, warming the greenhouse.

How greenhouse gases affect global warming

The gases in the atmosphere that absorb radiation are known as "greenhouse gases" (sometimes abbreviated as GHG) because they are largely responsible for the greenhouse effect. The greenhouse effect, in turn, is one of the leading causes of global warming. The most significant greenhouse gases are water vapor (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). "While oxygen (O2) is the second most abundant gas in our atmosphere, O2 does not absorb thermal infrared radiation," Michael Daley, an associate professor of environmental science at Lasell College, told Live Science.

While some say that global warming is a natural process and that there have always been greenhouse gasses, the amount of gasses in the atmosphere has skyrocketed in recent history. The Industrial Revolution had a big part to play in the amount of atmospheric CO2 being released. Before, CO2 fluctuated between about 180 ppm during ice ages and 280 ppm during interglacial warm periods. Since the Industrial Revolution, though, the amount of CO2 has dramatically increased to 100 times faster than the increase when the last ice age ended, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

Fluorinated gases that is, gases to which the element fluorine was added — including hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride, are created during industrial processes and are also considered greenhouse gases. Though they are present in very small concentrations, they trap heat very effectively, making them high "global-warming potential" (GWP) gases.

Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), once used as refrigerants and aerosol propellants until they were phased out by international agreement, are also greenhouse gases.

Three factors affect the degree to which any greenhouse gas will influence global warming:

  • Its abundance in the atmosphere
  • How long it stays in the atmosphere
  • Its global-warming potential

Carbon dioxide has a significant impact on global warming partly because of its abundance in the atmosphere. According to the EPA, in 2012, U.S. greenhouse gas emissions totaled 6,526 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents, which equaled 82 percent of all human caused greenhouse gasses. Additionally, CO2 stays in the atmosphere for thousands of years.

However, methane is about 21 times more efficient at absorbing radiation than CO2, giving it a high GWP rating, even though it stays in the atmosphere only about 10 years, according to the EPA.

Sources of greenhouse gases

Some greenhouse gases, like methane, are produced through agricultural practices including livestock manure management. Others, like CO2, largely result from natural processes like respiration and from the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas. The production of electricity is the source of 70 percent of the United States' sulfur dioxide emissions, 13 percent of nitrogen oxide emissions, and 40 percent of carbon dioxide emissions, according to the EPA.

The second cause of CO2 release is deforestation, according to research published by Duke University. When trees are killed to produce goods or heat, they release the carbon that is normally stored for photosynthesis. This process releases nearly a billion tons of carbon into the atmosphere per year, according to the 2010 Global Forest Resources Assessment.

It's worth noting that forestry and other land-use practices offset some of these greenhouse gas emissions, according to the EPA. "Replanting helps to reduce the buildup of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere as growing trees sequester carbon dioxide through photosynthesis. Atmospheric carbon dioxide is converted and stored in the vegetation and soils of the forest. However, forests cannot sequester all of the carbon dioxide we are emitting to the atmosphere through the burning of fossil fuels and a reduction in fossil fuel emissions is still necessary to avoid build up in the atmosphere," said Daley.

Worldwide, the output of greenhouse gases is a source of grave concern: From the time the Industrial Revolution began to the year 2009, atmospheric CO2 levels have increased almost 38 percent and methane levels have increased a whopping 148 percent, according to NASA, and most of that increase has been in the past 50 years. Because of global warming, 2014 was the warmest year on record and 10 of the hottest years have all come after 1998.

"The warming we observe affects atmospheric circulation, which impacts rainfall patterns globally. This will lead to big environmental changes, and challenges, for people all across the globe," Josef Werne, an associate professor in the department of geology and planetary science at the University of Pittsburgh, told Live Science.

If these trends continue, scientists, government officials and a growing number of citizens fear that the worst effects of global warming — extreme weather, rising sea levels, plant and animal extinctions, ocean acidification, major shifts in climate and unprecedented social upheaval — will be inevitable. In answer to the problems caused by global warming by greenhouse gasses, the government created a climate action plan in 2013.

Additional reporting by Alina Bradford, Live Science Contributor

For the latest information on greenhouse gases, visit:

Additional resources

Editor's Recommendations

   

출처: <http://www.livescience.com/37821-greenhouse-gases.html>

'지구별 이야기 > 기후와 지구온난화' 카테고리의 다른 글

Global Warming  (0) 2016.06.28
What is the Greenhouse Effect?  (0) 2016.06.27
지구온난화  (1) 2016.06.27
Global warming  (1) 2016.06.27
Major Greenhouse Gas Reductions Needed by 2050: IPCC  (0) 2016.06.27

지구별은 점점 더워지고 있을까..?

(NASA astronaut photograph ISS022-E-6674.)

과거에 비해서 얼마나 더 더울까 ..?

이 현상이 자연적인 요동의 범주에 있는 것은 아닐까 ..?

얼마나 더 더워 질까 ..?

더워 진다면, 어떤 일들을 초래하게 될 것인가 ..

지난 백년간 한 1도 정도 올라간 기온

지난 백여년 간의 이산화탄소, 메탄 농도의 변화

빙하에 포획된 공기시료

지난 백만년 동안의 기온 변화

지난 천오백년간의 기온 변화, 혹은 기온 이상

지난 백년간에 엘리뇨, 태양 복사에너지, 화산재 등 전지국적인 원인현상과 기온관계

태양 극대기와 극소기간  .. 복사 에너지의 변화를 주는 요인..

지난 30년간의 태양 활동의 변화

지난 삼십년 대기권, 성층권의 온도 변화 등

백년 후 온도 변화 시물레이션 ..

여러가지 시나리오가 있겠지만 ..  대략 2~6도 증가 예상

기온이 올라가면 .. 강수변화, 기온 극한값을 보이는 현상이 많이 나타나겠지..

그래도 화성처럼이나 물이 말라버리는 현상까지는 없겠지.

해수면의 변화 ..

결국은 만조수위가 높아진 다는 얘기 같은데 .. 투발루 같은 상황 까지는 안갈 듯 하고 ..

다음 세기까지 한 60cm 높아진다는 것은  .. 의미있는 변화를 생각 할 수 있을 것 같다.

   

과학자 들의 의견은  .. 결국 과학으로 준비해야 한다는 것이지.

우리 시대 만이 아니고, 우리 아이들의 시대 까지 준비해야 한다는 것이고 ..

   

그림, 사진등

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/

에서 퍼옴

Global Warming

By Holli RiebeekDesign by Robert SimmonJune 3, 2010

Throughout its long history, Earth has warmed and cooled time and again. Climate has changed when the planet received more or less sunlight due to subtle shifts in its orbit, as the atmosphere or surface changed, or when the Sun's energy varied. But in the past century, another force has started to influence Earth's climate: humanity

Previous versions of this article were published in 2007 and 2002. Archived versions are available as PDF files.

(NASA astronaut photograph ISS022-E-6674.)

What is Global Warming?

Global warming is the unusually rapid increase in Earth's average surface temperature over the past century primarily due to the greenhouse gases released by people burning fossil fuels.

How Does Today's Warming Compare to Past Climate Change?

Earth has experienced climate change in the past without help from humanity. But the current climatic warming is occurring much more rapidly than past warming events.

Why Do Scientists Think Current Warming Isn't Natural?

In Earth's history before the Industrial Revolution, Earth's climate changed due to natural causes unrelated to human activity. These natural causes are still in play today, but their influence is too small or they occur too slowly to explain the rapid warming seen in recent decades.

How Much More Will Earth Warm?

Models predict that as the world consumes ever more fossil fuel, greenhouse gas concentrations will continue to rise, and Earth's average surface temperature will rise with them. Based on plausible emission scenarios, average surface temperatures could rise between 2°C and 6°C by the end of the 21st century. Some of this warming will occur even if future greenhouse gas emissions are reduced, because the Earth system has not yet fully adjusted to environmental changes we have already made.

How Will Earth Respond to Warming Temperatures?

The impact of global warming is far greater than just increasing temperatures. Warming modifies rainfall patterns, amplifies coastal erosion, lengthens the growing season in some regions, melts ice caps and glaciers, and alters the ranges of some infectious diseases. Some of these changes are already occurring.

References and Related Resources

Global Warming

Throughout its long history, Earth has warmed and cooled time and again. Climate has changed when the planet received more or less sunlight due to subtle shifts in its orbit, as the atmosphere or surface changed, or when the Sun's energy varied. But in the past century, another force has started to influence Earth's climate: humanity

How does this warming compare to previous changes in Earth's climate? How can we be certain that human-released greenhouse gases are causing the warming? How much more will the Earth warm? How will Earth respond? Answering these questions is perhaps the most significant scientific challenge of our time.

What is Global Warming?

Global warming is the unusually rapid increase in Earth's average surface temperature over the past century primarily due to the greenhouse gases released as people burn fossil fuels. The global average surface temperature rose 0.6 to 0.9 degrees Celsius (1.1 to 1.6° F) between 1906 and 2005, and the rate of temperature increase has nearly doubled in the last 50 years. Temperatures are certain to go up further.

Despite ups and downs from year to year, global average surface temperature is rising. By the beginning of the 21st century, Earth's temperature was roughly 0.5 degrees Celsius above the long-term (1951–1980) average. (NASA figure adapted from Goddard Institute for Space Studies Surface Temperature Analysis.)

Earth's natural greenhouse effect

Earth's temperature begins with the Sun. Roughly 30 percent of incoming sunlight is reflected back into space by bright surfaces like clouds and ice. Of the remaining 70 percent, most is absorbed by the land and ocean, and the rest is absorbed by the atmosphere. The absorbed solar energy heats our planet.

As the rocks, the air, and the seas warm, they radiate "heat" energy (thermal infrared radiation). From the surface, this energy travels into the atmosphere where much of it is absorbed by water vapor and long-lived greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane.

When they absorb the energy radiating from Earth's surface, microscopic water or greenhouse gas molecules turn into tiny heaters— like the bricks in a fireplace, they radiate heat even after the fire goes out. They radiate in all directions. The energy that radiates back toward Earth heats both the lower atmosphere and the surface, enhancing the heating they get from direct sunlight.

This absorption and radiation of heat by the atmosphere—the natural greenhouse effect—is beneficial for life on Earth. If there were no greenhouse effect, the Earth's average surface temperature would be a very chilly -18°C (0°F) instead of the comfortable 15°C (59°F) that it is today.

See Climate and Earth's Energy Budget to read more about how sunlight fuels Earth's climate.

The enhanced greenhouse effect

What has scientists concerned now is that over the past 250 years, humans have been artificially raising the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere at an ever-increasing rate, mostly by burning fossil fuels, but also from cutting down carbon-absorbing forests. Since the Industrial Revolution began in about 1750, carbon dioxide levels have increased nearly 38 percent as of 2009 and methane levels have increased 148 percent.

Increases in concentrations of carbon dioxide (top) and methane (bottom) coincided with the start of the Industrial Revolution in about 1750. Measurements from Antarctic ice cores (green lines) combined with direct atmospheric measurements (blue lines) show the increase of both gases over time. (NASA graphs by Robert Simmon, based on data from the NOAA Paleoclimatology and Earth System Research Laboratory.)

The atmosphere today contains more greenhouse gas molecules, so more of the infrared energy emitted by the surface ends up being absorbed by the atmosphere. Since some of the extra energy from a warmer atmosphere radiates back down to the surface, Earth's surface temperature rises. By increasing the concentration of greenhouse gases, we are making Earth's atmosphere a more efficient greenhouse.

How is Today's Warming Different from the Past?

Earth has experienced climate change in the past without help from humanity. We know about past climates because of evidence left in tree rings, layers of ice in glaciers, ocean sediments, coral reefs, and layers of sedimentary rocks. For example, bubbles of air in glacial ice trap tiny samples of Earth's atmosphere, giving scientists a history of greenhouse gases that stretches back more than 800,000 years. The chemical make-up of the ice provides clues to the average global temperature.

See the Earth Observatory's series Paleoclimatology for details about how scientists study past climates.

   

Glacial ice and air bubbles trapped in it (top) preserve an 800,000-year record of temperature & carbon dioxide. Earth has cycled between ice ages (low points, large negative anomalies) and warm interglacials (peaks). (Photograph courtesy National Snow & Ice Data Center. NASA graph by Robert Simmon, based on data from Jouzel et al., 2007.)

Using this ancient evidence, scientists have built a record of Earth's past climates, or "paleoclimates." The paleoclimate record combined with global models shows past ice ages as well as periods even warmer than today. But the paleoclimate record also reveals that the current climatic warming is occurring much more rapidly than past warming events.

As the Earth moved out of ice ages over the past million years, the global temperature rose a total of 4 to 7 degrees Celsius over about 5,000 years. In the past century alone, the temperature has climbed 0.7 degrees Celsius, roughly ten times faster than the average rate of ice-age-recovery warming.

Temperature histories from paleoclimate data (green line) compared to the history based on modern instruments (blue line) suggest that global temperature is warmer now than it has been in the past 1,000 years, and possibly longer. (Graph adapted from Mann et al., 2008.)

Models predict that Earth will warm between 2 and 6 degrees Celsius in the next century. When global warming has happened at various times in the past two million years, it has taken the planet about 5,000 years to warm 5 degrees. The predicted rate of warming for the next century is at least 20 times faster. This rate of change is extremely unusual.

Is Current Warming Natural?

In Earth's history before the Industrial Revolution, Earth's climate changed due to natural causes not related to human activity. Most often, global climate has changed because of variations in sunlight. Tiny wobbles in Earth's orbit altered when and where sunlight falls on Earth's surface. Variations in the Sun itself have alternately increased and decreased the amount of solar energy reaching Earth. Volcanic eruptions have generated particles that reflect sunlight, brightening the planet and cooling the climate. Volcanic activity has also, in the deep past, increased greenhouse gases over millions of years, contributing to episodes of global warming.

A biographical sketch of Milutin Milankovitch describes how changes in Earth's orbit affects its climate.

These natural causes are still in play today, but their influence is too small or they occur too slowly to explain the rapid warming seen in recent decades. We know this because scientists closely monitor the natural and human activities that influence climate with a fleet of satellites and surface instruments.

Remote meteorological stations (left) and orbiting satellites (right) help scientists monitor the causes and effects of global warming. [Images courtesy NOAA Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (left) and Environmental Visualization Laboratory (right).]

NASA satellites record a host of vital signs including atmospheric aerosols (particles from both natural sources and human activities, such as factories, fires, deserts, and erupting volcanoes), atmospheric gases (including greenhouse gases), energy radiated from Earth's surface and the Sun, ocean surface temperature changes, global sea level, the extent of ice sheets, glaciers and sea ice, plant growth, rainfall, cloud structure, and more.

On the ground, many agencies and nations support networks of weather and climate-monitoring stations that maintain temperature, rainfall, and snow depth records, and buoys that measure surface water and deep ocean temperatures. Taken together, these measurements provide an ever-improving record of both natural events and human activity for the past 150 years.

Scientists integrate these measurements into climate models to recreate temperatures recorded over the past 150 years. Climate model simulations that consider only natural solar variability and volcanic aerosols since 1750—omitting observed increases in greenhouse gases—are able to fit the observations of global temperatures only up until about 1950. After that point, the decadal trend in global surface warming cannot be explained without including the contribution of the greenhouse gases added by humans.

Though people have had the largest impact on our climate since 1950, natural changes to Earth's climate have also occurred in recent times. For example, two major volcanic eruptions, El Chichon in 1982 and Pinatubo in 1991, pumped sulfur dioxide gas high into the atmosphere. The gas was converted into tiny particles that lingered for more than a year, reflecting sunlight and shading Earth's surface. Temperatures across the globe dipped for two to three years.

Although Earth's temperature fluctuates naturally, human influence on climate has eclipsed the magnitude of natural temperature changes over the past 120 years. Natural influences on temperature—El Niño, solar variability, and volcanic aerosols—have varied approximately plus and minus 0.2° C (0.4° F), (averaging to about zero), while human influences have contributed roughly 0.8° C (1° F) of warming since 1889. (Graphs adapted from Lean et al., 2008.)

Although volcanoes are active around the world, and continue to emit carbon dioxide as they did in the past, the amount of carbon dioxide they release is extremely small compared to human emissions. On average, volcanoes emit between 130 and 230 million tonnes of carbon dioxide per year. By burning fossil fuels, people release in excess of 100 times more, about 26 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere every year (as of 2005). As a result, human activity overshadows any contribution volcanoes may have made to recent global warming.

Changes in the brightness of the Sun can influence the climate from decade to decade, but an increase in solar output falls short as an explanation for recent warming. NASA satellites have been measuring the Sun's output since 1978. The total energy the Sun radiates varies over an 11-year cycle. During solar maxima, solar energy is approximately 0.1 percent higher on average than it is during solar minima.

The transparent halo known as the solar corona changes between solar maximum (left) and solar minimum (right). (NASA Extreme Ultraviolet Telescope images from the SOHO Data Archive.)

Each cycle exhibits subtle differences in intensity and duration. As of early 2010, the solar brightness since 2005 has been slightly lower, not higher, than it was during the previous 11-year minimum in solar activity, which occurred in the late 1990s. This implies that the Sun's impact between 2005 and 2010 might have been to slightly decrease the warming that greenhouse emissions alone would have caused.

Satellite measurements of daily (light line) and monthly average (dark line) total solar irradiance since 1979 have not detected a clear long-term trend. (NASA graph by Robert Simmon, based on data from the ACRIM Science Team.)

Scientists theorize that there may be a multi-decadal trend in solar output, though if one exists, it has not been observed as yet. Even if the Sun were getting brighter, however, the pattern of warming observed on Earth since 1950 does not match the type of warming the Sun alone would cause. When the Sun's energy is at its peak (solar maxima), temperatures in both the lower atmosphere (troposphere) and the upper atmosphere (stratosphere) become warmer. Instead, observations show the pattern expected from greenhouse gas effects: Earth's surface and troposphere have warmed, but the stratosphere has cooled.

Satellite measurements show warming in the troposphere (lower atmosphere, green line) but cooling in the stratosphere (upper atmosphere, red line). This vertical pattern is consistent with global warming due to increasing greenhouse gases, but inconsistent with warming from natural causes. (Graph by Robert Simmon, based on data from Remote Sensing Systems, sponsored by the NOAA Climate and Global Change Program.)

The stratosphere gets warmer during solar maxima because the ozone layer absorbs ultraviolet light; more ultraviolet light during solar maxima means warmer temperatures. Ozone depletion explains the biggest part of the cooling of the stratosphere over recent decades, but it can't account for all of it. Increased concentrations of carbon dioxide in the troposphere and stratosphere together contribute to cooling in the stratosphere.

How Much More Will Earth Warm?

To further explore the causes and effects of global warming and to predict future warming, scientists build climate models—computer simulations of the climate system. Climate models are designed to simulate the responses and interactions of the oceans and atmosphere, and to account for changes to the land surface, both natural and human-induced. They comply with fundamental laws of physics—conservation of energy, mass, and momentum—and account for dozens of factors that influence Earth's climate.

Though the models are complicated, rigorous tests with real-world data hone them into powerful tools that allow scientists to explore our understanding of climate in ways not otherwise possible. By experimenting with the models—removing greenhouse gases emitted by the burning of fossil fuels or changing the intensity of the Sun to see how each influences the climate—scientists use the models to better understand Earth's current climate and to predict future climate.

The models predict that as the world consumes ever more fossil fuel, greenhouse gas concentrations will continue to rise, and Earth's average surface temperature will rise with them. Based on a range of plausible emission scenarios, average surface temperatures could rise between 2°C and 6°C by the end of the 21st century.

Model simulations by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimate that Earth will warm between two and six degrees Celsius over the next century, depending on how fast carbon dioxide emissions grow. Scenarios that assume that people will burn more and more fossil fuel provide the estimates in the top end of the temperature range, while scenarios that assume that greenhouse gas emissions will grow slowly give lower temperature predictions. The orange line provides an estimate of global temperatures if greenhouse gases stayed at year 2000 levels. (©2007 IPCC WG1 AR-4.)

Climate Feedbacks

Greenhouse gases are only part of the story when it comes to global warming. Changes to one part of the climate system can cause additional changes to the way the planet absorbs or reflects energy. These secondary changes are called climate feedbacks, and they could more than double the amount of warming caused by carbon dioxide alone. The primary feedbacks are due to snow and ice, water vapor, clouds, and the carbon cycle.

Snow and ice

Perhaps the most well known feedback comes from melting snow and ice in the Northern Hemisphere. Warming temperatures are already melting a growing percentage of Arctic sea ice, exposing dark ocean water during the perpetual sunlight of summer. Snow cover on land is also dwindling in many areas. In the absence of snow and ice, these areas go from having bright, sunlight-reflecting surfaces that cool the planet to having dark, sunlight-absorbing surfaces that bring more energy into the Earth system and cause more warming.

Canada's Athabasca Glacier has been shrinking by about 15 meters per year. In the past 125 years, the glacier has lost half its volume and has retreated more than 1.5 kilometers. As glaciers retreat, sea ice disappears, and snow melts earlier in the spring, the Earth absorbs more sunlight than it would if the reflective snow and ice remained. (Photograph ©2005 Hugh Saxby.)

Water Vapor

The largest feedback is water vapor. Water vapor is a strong greenhouse gas. In fact, because of its abundance in the atmosphere, water vapor causes about two-thirds of greenhouse warming, a key factor in keeping temperatures in the habitable range on Earth. But as temperatures warm, more water vapor evaporates from the surface into the atmosphere, where it can cause temperatures to climb further.

The question that scientists ask is, how much water vapor will be in the atmosphere in a warming world? The atmosphere currently has an average equilibrium or balance between water vapor concentration and temperature. As temperatures warm, the atmosphere becomes capable of containing more water vapor, and so water vapor concentrations go up to regain equilibrium. Will that trend hold as temperatures continue to warm?

The amount of water vapor that enters the atmosphere ultimately determines how much additional warming will occur due to the water vapor feedback. The atmosphere responds quickly to the water vapor feedback. So far, most of the atmosphere has maintained a near constant balance between temperature and water vapor concentration as temperatures have gone up in recent decades. If this trend continues, and many models say that it will, water vapor has the capacity to double the warming caused by carbon dioxide alone.

Clouds

Closely related to the water vapor feedback is the cloud feedback. Clouds cause cooling by reflecting solar energy, but they also cause warming by absorbing infrared energy (like greenhouse gases) from the surface when they are over areas that are warmer than they are. In our current climate, clouds have a cooling effect overall, but that could change in a warmer environment.

Clouds can both cool the planet (by reflecting visible light from the sun) and warm the planet (by absorbing heat radiation emitted by the surface). On balance, clouds slightly cool the Earth. (NASA Astronaut Photograph STS31-E-9552 courtesy Johnson space Center Earth Observations Lab.)

If clouds become brighter, or the geographical extent of bright clouds expands, they will tend to cool Earth's surface. Clouds can become brighter if more moisture converges in a particular region or if more fine particles (aerosols) enter the air. If fewer bright clouds form, it will contribute to warming from the cloud feedback.

See Ship Tracks South of Alaska to learn how aerosols can make clouds brighter.

Clouds, like greenhouse gases, also absorb and re-emit infrared energy. Low, warm clouds emit more energy than high, cold clouds. However, in many parts of the world, energy emitted by low clouds can be absorbed by the abundant water vapor above them. Further, low clouds often have nearly the same temperatures as the Earth's surface, and so emit similar amounts of infrared energy. In a world without low clouds, the amount of emitted infrared energy escaping to space would not be too different from a world with low clouds.

Clouds emit thermal infrared (heat) radiation in proportion to their temperature, which is related to altitude. This image shows the Western Hemisphere in the thermal infrared. Warm ocean and land surface areas are white and light gray; cool, low-level clouds are medium gray; and cold, high-altitude clouds are dark gray and black. (NASA image courtesy GOES Project Science.)

High cold clouds, however, form in a part of the atmosphere where energy-absorbing water vapor is scarce. These clouds trap (absorb) energy coming from the lower atmosphere, and emit little energy to space because of their frigid temperatures. In a world with high clouds, a significant amount of energy that would otherwise escape to space is captured in the atmosphere. As a result, global temperatures are higher than in a world without high clouds.

If warmer temperatures result in a greater amount of high clouds, then less infrared energy will be emitted to space. In other words, more high clouds would enhance the greenhouse effect, reducing the Earth's capability to cool and causing temperatures to warm.

See Clouds and Radiation for a more complete description.

Scientists aren't entirely sure where and to what degree clouds will end up amplifying or moderating warming, but most climate models predict a slight overall positive feedback or amplification of warming due to a reduction in low cloud cover. A recent observational study found that fewer low, dense clouds formed over a region in the Pacific Ocean when temperatures warmed, suggesting a positive cloud feedback in this region as the models predicted. Such direct observational evidence is limited, however, and clouds remain the biggest source of uncertainty--apart from human choices to control greenhouse gases—in predicting how much the climate will change.

The Carbon Cycle

Increased atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations and warming temperatures are causing changes in the Earth's natural carbon cycle that also can feedback on atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. For now, primarily ocean water, and to some extent ecosystems on land, are taking up about half of our fossil fuel and biomass burning emissions. This behavior slows global warming by decreasing the rate of atmospheric carbon dioxide increase, but that trend may not continue. Warmer ocean waters will hold less dissolved carbon, leaving more in the atmosphere.

About half the carbon dioxide emitted into the air from burning fossil fuels dissolves in the ocean. This map shows the total amount of human-made carbon dioxide in ocean water from the surface to the sea floor. Blue areas have low amounts, while yellow regions are rich in anthropogenic carbon dioxide. High amounts occur where currents carry the carbon-dioxide-rich surface water into the ocean depths. (Map adapted from Sabine et al., 2004.)

See The Ocean's Carbon Balance on the Earth Observatory.

On land, changes in the carbon cycle are more complicated. Under a warmer climate, soils, especially thawing Arctic tundra, could release trapped carbon dioxide or methane to the atmosphere. Increased fire frequency and insect infestations also release more carbon as trees burn or die and decay.

On the other hand, extra carbon dioxide can stimulate plant growth in some ecosystems, allowing these plants to take additional carbon out of the atmosphere. However, this effect may be reduced when plant growth is limited by water, nitrogen, and temperature. This effect may also diminish as carbon dioxide increases to levels that become saturating for photosynthesis. Because of these complications, it is not clear how much additional carbon dioxide plants can take out of the atmosphere and how long they could continue to do so.

The impact of climate change on the land carbon cycle is extremely complex, but on balance, land carbon sinks will become less efficient as plants reach saturation, where they can no longer take up additional carbon dioxide, and other limitations on growth occur, and as land starts to add more carbon to the atmosphere from warming soil, fires, and insect infestations. This will result in a faster increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide and more rapid global warming. In some climate models, carbon cycle feedbacks from both land and ocean add more than a degree Celsius to global temperatures by 2100.

Emission Scenarios

Scientists predict the range of likely temperature increase by running many possible future scenarios through climate models. Although some of the uncertainty in climate forecasts comes from imperfect knowledge of climate feedbacks, the most significant source of uncertainty in these predictions is that scientists don't know what choices people will make to control greenhouse gas emissions.

The higher estimates are made on the assumption that the entire world will continue using more and more fossil fuel per capita, a scenario scientists call "business-as-usual." More modest estimates come from scenarios in which environmentally friendly technologies such as fuel cells, solar panels, and wind energy replace much of today's fossil fuel combustion.

It takes decades to centuries for Earth to fully react to increases in greenhouse gases. Carbon dioxide, among other greenhouse gases, will remain in the atmosphere long after emissions are reduced, contributing to continuing warming. In addition, as Earth has warmed, much of the excess energy has gone into heating the upper layers of the ocean. Like a hot water bottle on a cold night, the heated ocean will continue warming the lower atmosphere well after greenhouse gases have stopped increasing.

These considerations mean that people won't immediately see the impact of reduced greenhouse gas emissions. Even if greenhouse gas concentrations stabilized today, the planet would continue to warm by about 0.6°C over the next century because of greenhouses gases already in the atmosphere.

See Earth's Big Heat Bucket, Correcting Ocean Cooling, and Climate Q&A: If we immediately stopped emitting greenhouse gases, would global warming stop? to learn more about the ocean heat and global warming.

How Will Global Warming Change Earth?

The impact of increased surface temperatures is significant in itself. But global warming will have additional, far-reaching effects on the planet. Warming modifies rainfall patterns, amplifies coastal erosion, lengthens the growing season in some regions, melts ice caps and glaciers, and alters the ranges of some infectious diseases. Some of these changes are already occurring.

Global warming will shift major climate patterns, possibly prolonging and intensifying the current drought in the U.S. Southwest. The white ring of bleached rock on the once-red cliffs that hold Lake Powell indicate the drop in water level over the past decade—the result of repeated winters with low snowfall. (Photograph ©2006 Tigresblanco.)

Changing Weather

For most places, global warming will result in more frequent hot days and fewer cool days, with the greatest warming occurring over land. Longer, more intense heat waves will become more common. Storms, floods, and droughts will generally be more severe as precipitation patterns change. Hurricanes may increase in intensity due to warmer ocean surface temperatures.

Apart from driving temperatures up, global warming is likely to cause bigger, more destructive storms, leading to an overall increase in precipitation. With some exceptions, the tropics will likely receive less rain (orange) as the planet warms, while the polar regions will receive more precipitation (green). White areas indicate that fewer than two-thirds of the climate models agreed on how precipitation will change. Stippled areas reveal where more than 90 percent of the models agreed. (©2007 IPCC WG1 AR-4.)

It is impossible to pin any single unusual weather event on global warming, but emerging evidence suggests that global warming is already influencing the weather. Heat waves, droughts, and intense rain events have increased in frequency during the last 50 years, and human-induced global warming more likely than not contributed to the trend.

Rising Sea Levels

The weather isn't the only thing global warming will impact: rising sea levels will erode coasts and cause more frequent coastal flooding. Some island nations will disappear. The problem is serious because up to 10 percent of the world's population lives in vulnerable areas less than 10 meters (about 30 feet) above sea level.

Between 1870 and 2000, the sea level increased by 1.7 millimeters per year on average, for a total sea level rise of 221 millimeters (0.7 feet or 8.7 inches). And the rate of sea level rise is accelerating. Since 1993, NASA satellites have shown that sea levels are rising more quickly, about 3 millimeters per year, for a total sea level rise of 48 millimeters (0.16 feet or 1.89 inches) between 1993 and 2009.

Sea levels crept up about 20 centimeters (7.9 inches) during the twentieth century. Sea levels are predicted to go up between 18 and 59 cm (7.1 and 23 inches) over the next century, though the increase could be greater if ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica melt more quickly than predicted. Higher sea levels will erode coastlines and cause more frequent flooding. (Graph ©2007 Robert Rohde.)

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates that sea levels will rise between 0.18 and 0.59 meters (0.59 to 1.9 feet) by 2099 as warming sea water expands, and mountain and polar glaciers melt. These sea level change predictions may be underestimates, however, because they do not account for any increases in the rate at which the world's major ice sheets are melting. As temperatures rise, ice will melt more quickly. Satellite measurements reveal that the Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets are shedding about 125 billion tons of ice per year—enough to raise sea levels by 0.35 millimeters (0.01 inches) per year. If the melting accelerates, the increase in sea level could be significantly higher.

Impacting Ecosystems

More importantly, perhaps, global warming is already putting pressure on ecosystems, the plants and animals that co-exist in a particular climate zone, both on land and in the ocean. Warmer temperatures have already shifted the growing season in many parts of the globe. The growing season in parts of the Northern Hemisphere became two weeks longer in the second half of the 20th century. Spring is coming earlier in both hemispheres.

This change in the growing season affects the broader ecosystem. Migrating animals have to start seeking food sources earlier. The shift in seasons may already be causing the lifecycles of pollinators, like bees, to be out of synch with flowering plants and trees. This mismatch can limit the ability of both pollinators and plants to survive and reproduce, which would reduce food availability throughout the food chain.

See Buzzing About Climate Change to read more about how the lifecycle of bees is synched with flowering plants.

Warmer temperatures also extend the growing season. This means that plants need more water to keep growing throughout the season or they will dry out, increasing the risk of failed crops and wildfires. Once the growing season ends, shorter, milder winters fail to kill dormant insects, increasing the risk of large, damaging infestations in subsequent seasons.

In some ecosystems, maximum daily temperatures might climb beyond the tolerance of indigenous plant or animal. To survive the extreme temperatures, both marine and land-based plants and animals have started to migrate towards the poles. Those species, and in some cases, entire ecosystems, that cannot quickly migrate or adapt, face extinction. The IPCC estimates that 20-30 percent of plant and animal species will be at risk of extinction if temperatures climb more than 1.5° to 2.5°C.

Impacting People

The changes to weather and ecosystems will also affect people more directly. Hardest hit will be those living in low-lying coastal areas, and residents of poorer countries who do not have the resources to adapt to changes in temperature extremes and water resources. As tropical temperature zones expand, the reach of some infectious diseases, such as malaria, will change. More intense rains and hurricanes and rising sea levels will lead to more severe flooding and potential loss of property and life.

One inevitable consequence of global warming is sea-level rise. In the face of higher sea levels and more intense storms, coastal communities face greater risk of rapid beach erosion from destructive storms like the intense nor'easter of April 2007 that caused this damage. (Photograph ©2007 metimbers2000.)

Hotter summers and more frequent fires will lead to more cases of heat stroke and deaths, and to higher levels of near-surface ozone and smoke, which would cause more 'code red' air quality days. Intense droughts can lead to an increase in malnutrition. On a longer time scale, fresh water will become scarcer, especially during the summer, as mountain glaciers disappear, particularly in Asia and parts of North America.

On the flip side, there could be "winners" in a few places. For example, as long as the rise in global average temperature stays below 3 degrees Celsius, some models predict that global food production could increase because of the longer growing season at mid- to high-latitudes, provided adequate water resources are available. The same small change in temperature, however, would reduce food production at lower latitudes, where many countries already face food shortages. On balance, most research suggests that the negative impacts of a changing climate far outweigh the positive impacts. Current civilization—agriculture and population distribution—has developed based on the current climate. The more the climate changes, and the more rapidly it changes, the greater the cost of adaptation.

Ultimately, global warming will impact life on Earth in many ways, but the extent of the change is largely up to us. Scientists have shown that human emissions of greenhouse gases are pushing global temperatures up, and many aspects of climate are responding to the warming in the way that scientists predicted they would. This offers hope. Since people are causing global warming, people can mitigate global warming, if they act in time. Greenhouse gases are long-lived, so the planet will continue to warm and changes will continue to happen far into the future, but the degree to which global warming changes life on Earth depends on our decisions now.

CO2

카테고리 없음2016. 6. 27. 08:56

기후변화 감시 - CO₂

1999년부터 2013년까지 마우나로아,

안면도, 고산의 이산화탄소 농도 변화

   

출처: <https://www.climate.go.kr:8005/home/co2_desc.html>

By Andrea Thompson

Emissions of greenhouse gases grew at a faster rate over the decade from 2000 to 2010 than they did over the previous three decades, reaching the highest levels in human history, despite efforts to limit them, according to the last installment of the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, released Sunday.

Projections of global mean temperature anomalies over the 21st century relative to 1986–2005 from the combination of the computer models with process-based models, for greenhouse gas concentration scenarios. The assessed likely range is shown as a shaded band. The assessed likely ranges for the mean over the period 2081–2100 for all scenarios are given as coloured vertical bars, with the corresponding median value given as a horizontal line.

Click image to enlarge. Credit: IPCC Working Group I

This final installment, focused on mitigating climate change, says that in order to keep warming under the 2°C (3.6°F) threshold agreed on by the world's governments at a 2009 meeting in Copenhagen, greenhouse gas emissions in 2050 will have to be 40 to 70 percent lower than what they were in 2010. By the end of the century, they will need to be at zero, or could possibly even require taking carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, a controversial proposition.

The scientists who wrote the report examined about 1,000 scenarios for limiting greenhouse gas emissions through combinations of renewable energy development, increased energy efficiency, technologies that would capture and store carbon underground, and reforestation efforts. How to do this while limiting the impact to economic growth and poverty reduction is a key question, and the efforts necessary would likely differ from region to region, country to country, and state to state, the report said.

But the authors of the report, speaking to reporters in advance of the release, made one thing clear: "The longer we wait, the costlier it will be," said Charles Kolstad, an environmental economist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and a lead author of the report.

   

Half of all the greenhouse gas emissions from humans were emitted within the past 40 years, growing 2.2 percent per year over the past decade, compared to 0.4 percent per year over the previous three decades. This boost has come from two primary sources: "Emissions are increasing along with economic growth and population," said another study lead author, Robert Stavins, a Harvard economics and policy expert.

Climate change has already caused the planet's average temperature to rise by 1.6°F since the beginning of the 20th century. That temperature rise could reach 2.7°F above pre-industrial levels by the end of the century (and possibly as high as 8.64°F above 1986-2005 levels) if nothing is done to curb emissions, according to the first part of the IPCC's fifth assessment on climate change, as the entire report is called.

"Things are going to have to change if we do want to control climate change," said Leon Clarke, an IPCC author and research economist with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. "If we do nothing, temperatures will continue to rise."

Rising temperatures are expected to causes major shifts in ecosystems and precipitation patterns — with some areas becoming more prone to droughts and others to flooding, as well as affecting human health, food security, and potentially taxing infrastructure with stronger storms. The second part of the IPCC report detailed changes like these that are already occurring and warned they would become worse if greenhouse gas emissions aren't brought under control.

Controlling emissions means "de-carbonizing" the global economy, both by reducing the demand for so much energy and by supplying energy that generates far fewer, or no greenhouse gases, the report says. In particular, the use of coal, one of the dirtiest fossil fuels, was a major contributor to the rise in emissions over the past decade with the huge growth of developing countries like China's and India's. Trends like this must be reversed, and if steps aren't taken to remove carbon from the energy equation, greenhouse gas emissions could double or even triple by the middle of the century, the report says.

One way to de-carbonize energy production is through what IPCC author Benoit Lefevre, of the World Resources Institute, describes as "a fundamental shift in global investment from fossil fuel to renewable energy."

The growth of renewables has been stronger than what was anticipated in the last IPCC report, though emissions increases negated any benefit there, said Bill Hare, a climate scientist who is CEO and managing director of Climate Analytics, a non-profit focused on climate research. The IPCC doesn't make specific recommendations on how the switch to renewables should be achieved, though it discusses the direct investment in such technologies, as well as systems like a carbon tax that could push people away from more conventional energy sources.

Another way to pull carbon out of the energy system is to employ carbon capture and storage technology, which to date has been a controversial proposal. CCS, as it is called, has not been implemented on a large scale, and there are questions on whether carbon dioxide sequestered underground, for example, actually stays put over the long term.

CCS could become a key component of mitigation strategies depending on what level of carbon dioxide the world decides to try and stay below and which of the various mitigation pathways examined in the report it takes to get there. The longer we wait to begin reductions and the bigger the reduction it takes, the more likely it is that CCS comes into the picture.

"You can't get to the lower pathways without it," Hare told Climate Central.

The breakdown of total greenhouse gas emissions (converted to carbon dioxide equivalents) from 2010 by economic sector, with indirect emissions from electricity and heat production factored in. (AFOLU stands for Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use.)

Click image to enlarge. Credit: IPCC Working Group III

On the demand side of the equation, changing behaviors and building infrastructure that uses energy more efficienctly could lower the amount of energy needed. "Lifestyle and behavioral changes could reduce energy demand by up to 20 percent in the short term and by up to 50 percent of present levels by midcentury," the report says.

Infrastructure like buildings and transportation networks will become particularly important in the coming decades as more and more of the world's population comes to live in cities. As of 2011, 52 percent of the world's population lived in urban areas, and that percentage could increase to 70 percent by 2050 and urban land cover could increase by 50 to 300 percent by 2030.

With so much urban infrastructure to be built in these coming decades we have "a window of opportunity," Lefevre said, to build infrastructure "in a smart way and in a low-carbon way."

Economics and ethics are major considerations in making all of the decisions on how to mitigate global warming. Economics played a bigger role in this report than in previous iterations, in part because much more research has been done and was available for review. "This is really something new and very, very important," Lefevre said, because it increases the relevance of the report to policymakers who will be the ones deciding how investment in renewables are made, for example, and who bears the burden of implementing such changes.

Under the auspices of the United Nations, hundreds of scientists contribute to each part of each IPCC report, which have been released every six to seven year and seek to review the latest research on the state of climate science, its impacts, and the possibilities for adapting to and mitigating climate change. The reviews are meant to benefit policymakers in charge of making decisions on dealing with climate change. Those policymakers are working toward a global, binding agreement on climate change at a 2015 meeting in Paris. "Scientists have done their job now," Lefevre said. "They have outlined the roadmap . . . it's really about having policymakers pick up those roadmaps and adapt them to their countries and implement them."

Not everyone is optimistic that these countries will actually reach agreement.

"There won't be any international agreement," said Steven Cohen, executive director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University, citing the inherent tensions between the interests of developed and developing countries. Cohen, who was not involved with the IPCC report, is still optimistic that humans can solve the issue of climate change and limit warming, but he thinks that economic incentives are what will get the job done.

Scientists involved with the report are also optimistic that humans can take action and prevent the worst effects of climate change.

"You can still do it. We can still hold warming below 2 degrees," Hare said, but he added: "Time is running out."

You May Also Like

Intense Cyclone Ita Bears Down on Australia

U.S. Drought Retreats 15 Percent in One Year

Cheap Solar Power Pushes Renewables Growth Worldwide

U.S. Corn Belt the Most Productive Region in the World?

   

출처: <http://www.climatecentral.org/news/major-greenhouse-gas-reductions-needed-to-curtail-climate-change-ipcc-17300>

   

'지구별 이야기 > 기후와 지구온난화' 카테고리의 다른 글

지구온난화  (1) 2016.06.27
Global warming  (1) 2016.06.27
지구환경과 국제적 조직  (0) 2016.06.27
Global warming  (0) 2016.06.27
지구온난화  (0) 2016.06.27